VT Schools Applaud Green Cleaning Bill
Local school officials in Vermont are in support of a bill passed by both chambers of the state Legislature last week, requiring the use of environmentally friendly cleaning products in schools. According to reports from the Bennington Banner, the bill, S.92, is pending authorization by Gov. Peter Shumlin. If signed into law, all public and independent schools will be required to only purchase cleaning products and air fresheners deemed environmentally preferable as of July 1.
"In my opinion this bill is an effort at improving the overall safety, air quality, and environment within our schools," said James Marsden, maintenance director for Mount Anthony Union middle and high school.
The bill is intended to keep cleaning supplies that contain toxic chemicals linked to asthma, cancer and other health issues out of schools. A similar switch to green cleaning products was made in all state buildings in 2004 under the Clean State Program.
Advocates of the bill, including the Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG), testified that green cleaning products are as effective and affordable as conventional supplies. Marsden said the district will only need to make minor changes when the law takes effect because it already uses many environmentally preferable products.
Both the middle and high school made a transition to "much safer cleaning products" over the past five years, and the district is actively engaged in the "Tools for Schools" program that addresses many of the safety and environmental concerns addressed in S.92.
Additional precautions the district takes include carefully storing and labeling products and doing all major cleaning after school during custodian shifts from 2:30 to 11 p.m. Custodians also spend limited time with chemicals that could have potential risks over extended periods of time.
"If its going to make kids healthy and staff healthy, then its a good bill," Superintendent Thomas Gallagher said.
Contrary to some reaction about potential increased costs associated with the mandate, Gallagher views the bill as a potential cost saver.
"Ultimately, it's a cost savings because you'll have less illness -- for kids and staff -- and that's a savings if we have fewer staff absent and fewer students absent," he said. "But the overriding factor is if it's going to improve the safety, then it's a good bill and I applaud the Legislature."
Click here to read this full article. For additional information on the bill, click here.
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by CleanLink.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of CleanLink.com or its staff. To find out more about Facebook commenting please read the Conversation Guidelines.